Thanks ichn2go. It was certainly a tough decision and the week before "she" almost got me to go for a 36G until I pointed out just how crowded we'd be.
I will soon find out how quality compares. Frankly, what we found when looking this time was that you really have trouble determining other than surface problems or obvious glitches. We expect to have a few items that need attention - and hopefully it will only be a few. I'll make a point of letting you know how it goes.
The price was virtually identicaly to a 2006 Journey 39K the dealer just received. The Amb does have a number of features as I noted above that are not on the Journey - and the Amb doesn't have some things that the Journey has. One of the main features was the floorplan. I hope Winnie will add the external satellite dish connection (don't recall seeing it on the 06) that HR has - makes an external dish much easier to use. We had the Winegard auto dish and it sometimes got lost and of course when parked under trees were were just out of luck. We are going to try an external this time - at least to start with.
This length and great floorplan is possible in a lower level model because of the 33,000 GVWR vs the 29,410 in the Journey (boosted from 27,910 April 1 for the 39K). I think the Tour/Ellipse are an attempt to correct that problem but a 40AD Tour would have cost us another $22k and we could not see enough value (and as noted - it was garish looking - kind of what one thinks a French WH might look like
. What disgusted my DW again was opening the battery compartment on the 36G (it had just arrived a week earlier) and seeing that all the batteries and the compartment were filthy. Winnie really should enclose it. Our new one has 4 x 6V coach batteries and the 2 auto batteries in a closed compartment, and needless to say the filth was not evident.
The ride seemed to be fine. I doubt that we will find it a whole lot different from the Freightliner since they are both pretty good. I also had to satisfy myself that the 3 point leveling system is OK - which I did. I think Winnie and all others should adopt the 3 camera system - what a difference. We really liked the BU camera on the Winnie as it let us see everything behind us when on the road. I found it was less useful when backing up because of the distortion. The Amb's camera at the back can be adjusted up and down from 2 buttons on the screen panel - a very nice feature as well. The side cameras can be operated manually (switch on the dash) or automatically - that is, from the turn signals.
Anyway, we have our fingers crossed that we haven't made a mistake. If it turns out to be a blunder, I'll be sure to let others know so they can learn from our mistakes.
Now, having said all this, what would I really have liked to purchase? A Wanderlodge or a Foretravel. Unfortunately, had I done that, she would have had me committed.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by ichn2go:
Great looking Moho Don, hope you are satisfied with the HR.
In the same price range definetly yes I would stay with Winnie.
If I hit the lottery would like to move up in the 500m to 750M price range.
Like my MOHO everything is working fine.
Good Miles </div></BLOCKQUOTE>