<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Rick Buddrus:
appealing to the more daft amoungst us!
Wow there Stan, you are one rude individual. IMHO. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
Well, perhaps. And if I can manage to get the point across, then it has been well worth the effort to risk being designated as being "rude".
Having spent an entire career being associated with the insurance industry, I tend to be steeped in fiscally repsonsible principles and practices of "insurance". And paying $100 per year to offset a **potential** loss of $200, within the insurance industry is considered total giggle-material: catering to daft pigeons just waiting to be plucked!
While your average retiree is well advised to set aside at least $1,500,00 for retirement, let's say that you've really bombed out, and only have a mere $1,000,000 in retirement assets. Based upon roadside service insurance rates, the cost of insuring *all* of your assets on the same basis would $500,000 each and every year. 'Course, after the second year, it wouldn't really matter, since your insurance company have wisely sucked up each and every last dollar you would ever see during your entire lifetime.