|
08-21-2008, 01:34 PM
|
#1
|
Winnebago Camper
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15
|
Does the driver and passenger footwell & headroom space vary by engine selection (Ford V-10 vs. Chevy engine vs. Ford Diesel) in E-450 based Class "C" Winnebagos? I'm looking to buy a used 24 foot model, but have some concerns about headroom and legroom (especially passenger legroom). Also, do the cab configurations vary by year?
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 01:34 PM
|
#2
|
Winnebago Camper
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15
|
Does the driver and passenger footwell & headroom space vary by engine selection (Ford V-10 vs. Chevy engine vs. Ford Diesel) in E-450 based Class "C" Winnebagos? I'm looking to buy a used 24 foot model, but have some concerns about headroom and legroom (especially passenger legroom). Also, do the cab configurations vary by year?
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 03:09 PM
|
#3
|
Winnebago Master
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Back at the ranch
Posts: 2,041
|
Hi TF - welcome Can't answer your question but wanted to say hi and welcome to the forum!
__________________
--John
2005 Horizon 40AD, 2005 Jeep Liberty CRD
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 03:27 PM
|
#4
|
Winnie-Wise
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Carlsbad, Ca.
Posts: 310
|
Hi and welcome. I had a 31ft. 2004 C Class with ford engine. All Ford C class regardless of brand are the same. They all use the same E-450 Van platform. Yes the passenger side has less legroom. Also the engine can radiate a lot of heat on some models. Headroom should not be a problem.
Chevy has more legroom I've been told but I've never have driven one.
They are quite comfortable for inside and can be very useful for some types of RV'ing.
Here's a link to the C Class Forum if you haven't tried it. You'll probably get more answers there.
C Class Forum
Good luck
Tom
__________________
2007 Itasca Suncruiser 33V
2009 Ford Flex Ltd. AWD Fa. Toad
2010 Jeep Rubicon offroad Toad
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 03:59 PM
|
#5
|
Winnebago Camper
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 7
|
Hi TF & welcome to the IRV2 forum. We have a 2006 Itasca Cambria, a "streamlined" class C MH that is 26' long. Winnebago does a good job with the Ford cab by using a slimmer glovebox on the engine cover which does not intrude on driver/passenger footroom as much as the OE Ford glovebox. That said, if you're taller than average you may still find the legroom on both sides restrictive. It is easy though to move the seat(s) or install swiveling seat mounts that will help more in gaining space.
The greatest benefits to modern class C motorhoming are the drivability and the two dashboard airbags [should the need for those ever happen]. No such feature in the bus-type MH's....
|
|
|
08-21-2008, 04:32 PM
|
#6
|
Winnie-Wise
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Full Time, TX Home Base
Posts: 432
|
Glad you found iRV2.com.
The E-450 is a bit short on foot space on the passenger side. Also, Ford and most manufacturers do not insulate the floor in the class C's. We had a 1999 Minnie Winnie DL and I had to pull the front seats, remove the carpet (glued directly to the metal floor) and install a thermal heat barrier and insulate the engine cover. took about 1/2 day and 200% improvement.
Ken
__________________
Amateur Radio Operator (KE5DFR)|Full-Time! - 2012 6.7L Ford Crew Cab Dually -2013 HitchHiker Champagne 38RLRSB - Travel with one Standard Schnauzer and one small Timneh African Gray Parrot
|
|
|
08-22-2008, 05:48 AM
|
#7
|
Winnie-Wise
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crossville, TN USA
Posts: 397
|
At 6'2" I have no problem driving the E-450.
__________________
Tom & Bonnie
2008 Winnebago Aspect 29H
A Class C Not a B+
2010 Ford Flex
|
|
|
08-23-2008, 11:48 AM
|
#8
|
Winnebago Owner
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 137
|
When I had my Ford Class C, I could only go back so far (I am 6'0") which was marginal, excessive heat would roast my leg, and I just felt cramped. I thought I had died and gone to Heaven the first time I drove my Class A, almost too much room
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Greg & Lynn (Full-Timing)
2011 Phaeton 42 QBH / Spartan Chassis
2003 Jeep GC Overland in Tow
|
|
|
08-23-2008, 11:51 AM
|
#9
|
Winnie-Wise
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crossville, TN USA
Posts: 397
|
I enjoy driving my class C better than I did my class A's.
__________________
Tom & Bonnie
2008 Winnebago Aspect 29H
A Class C Not a B+
2010 Ford Flex
|
|
|
08-23-2008, 11:33 PM
|
#10
|
Winnie-Wise
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 367
|
I've owned two Ford Class Cs; a 97 and an 87. Both very tight on leg room for the pass and not an over abundance for the driver.
__________________
Doug and Cassi
'05 Meridian 36G
|
|
|
08-24-2008, 07:30 AM
|
#11
|
iRV2 Marketing
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Conway, SC
Posts: 886
|
The GM/Workhorse Class C van cutaway chassis has more passenger foot room and legroom than the Ford. The passenger can actually place both feet on the same floorspace and be comfortable. Entry and egress from the seats into the coach is easier in the GM/WCC because the engine is further forward.
Go and check out a current model GM/Workhorse Class C powered coach and you will immediately see what I mean.
__________________
03 Adventurer 38G, Workhorse W22
F&R Track Bars, Safety+ , Ultrapower, Taylor Extremes, SGII
TST 507, Blue Ox, SMI, Koni FSD, CrossFire
RV/MH Hall of Fame - Lifetime Member
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|