Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-16-2014, 11:32 AM   #81
Winnebago Camper
 
TwelveVolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardbark View Post
Another chart, this one from AAA
http://www.aaa.com/aaa/Traveler/ITT910.pdf

Am I missing something, or is this table implying that 42' and 45' Class A's are not legal in DC, MD, TN and WA?
TwelveVolt is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 12:10 PM   #82
Winnebago Owner
 
tedgard01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 50
Do we really need a braking system in our toads?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan_public View Post
Ted,

Although not really relevant, I agree with you. That is, except for item 3. I looked in the Woodalls links above for North Carolina. It says, "RV Safety Requirements: All RVs: safety glass. Trailers over 4,000 lbs.: trailer brakes."

Do the laws in North Carolina specify restrictions for RV with toads? Do they define "trailer"? Is the Woodalls article incomplete?

Regards,

Dan.

I make my comments because they were relevant to me. You may not find them relevant, that is fine. Just like I find your comment rude and devisive, but that is just the way some folks are...

In regard to the NC laws, in my opinion the intent of the law is more important in this case than the specific verbiage. I am close to the requirements of the law, even though my vehicle does not exceed the limit stated in the law. Therefore I may not technically be out of compliance with the law. Regardless, I choose to be cautious, and error on the side of the intent. I know that with the braking system I am safer than without, and I am not going to quibble over a few pounds.


Ted
tedgard01 is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 12:14 PM   #83
Winnebago Camper
 
DMTTRANSPORT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 18
..........And no person here stating that Towing a Toad without a braking system is dangerous has ever towed a 2500 lb Boat with a 5,000 lb Pick up or is the weight ratio there a non issue? 30,000 lb + Coach towing a 5,000 lb +/- vehicle....JMO
__________________
2005 Newmar DS 4023, Spartan Chassis, ISL 370 Cumapart, 2008 Jeep Rubicon 4dr, 2015 Kia Soul, 1969 Italian & 2004 Akita
DMTTRANSPORT is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 12:27 PM   #84
Winnebago Camper
 
Francesca's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Port Hadlock, Washington
Posts: 33
In California at least brakes-on-toad requirement (or not) depends on stopping distance of the unbraked toad/tow vehicle combination. Though how that is determined is unclear. See this section of California law
Francesca is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 12:32 PM   #85
Winnebago Camper
 
DMTTRANSPORT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francesca View Post
In California at least brakes-on-toad requirement (or not) depends on stopping distance of the unbraked toad/tow vehicle combination. Though how that is determined is beyond me.

See this section of California law
Cali speaks of "towed vehicles" separate of "trailers" .....
__________________
2005 Newmar DS 4023, Spartan Chassis, ISL 370 Cumapart, 2008 Jeep Rubicon 4dr, 2015 Kia Soul, 1969 Italian & 2004 Akita
DMTTRANSPORT is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 12:41 PM   #86
Winnebago Camper
 
Francesca's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Port Hadlock, Washington
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMTTRANSPORT View Post
Cali speaks of "towed vehicles" separate of "trailers" .....
Yes, I know- requirement in that case is based on performance, though the standard isn't given. Such performance-based requirements are the norm rather than the exception but definitions are sorta mushy in some cases.

It's clearer elsewhere: For an example, Oregon (a State with no firm "requirement" for brakes on ANY towed unit) only firmly states required braking performance- they don't care how it's achieved. Here quoting page 15 at this ODOT publication:
Quote:
Brakes:

Any combination of vehicles must be equipped with brakes that are adequate to stop
within a certain distance. While traveling at a speed of 20 miles per hour without leaving a 12-foot wide lane the combination of vehicles must be able to stop:
-Within 25 feet for those vehicle combinations under 8,000 pounds.
-Within 35 feet for those vehicle combinations over 8,000 pounds.
So- if you're confident/satisfied that your rig can reliably do all that without brakes on the toad, you're golden.
Francesca is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 01:04 PM   #87
Winnebago Owner
 
CampDaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fulltime, USA
Posts: 111
Do we really need a braking system in our toads?

If it just a matter of choice, my choice was very simple. I like stopping in much less distance. There was no speculation, rumor, half truth, or advertising hype involved.
No children were harmed by my use of aux braking.
__________________
Dave and Nola, RVM1
The Journey is Our Destination!
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
https://davenola.blogspot.com/
CampDaven is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 01:27 PM   #88
Winnebago Owner
 
tedgard01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 50
Do we really need a braking system in our toads?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan_public View Post
Ted,

Although not really relevant, I agree with you. That is, except for item 3. I looked in the Woodalls links above for North Carolina. It says, "RV Safety Requirements: All RVs: safety glass. Trailers over 4,000 lbs.: trailer brakes."

Do the laws in North Carolina specify restrictions for RV with toads? Do they define "trailer"? Is the Woodalls article incomplete?

Regards,

Dan.

Dan,

After rereading your comment; "Although not really relevant, I agree with you." It occurred to me that you may have meant something like; "It may not be relevant if I agree with you....", versus meaning something like; "I don't find your comments to be relevant....".

If that is the case, I apologize for thinking that you were being rude, regardless if you agreed with me or not...



Ted
tedgard01 is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 02:16 PM   #89
Winnebago Camper
 
IMDSailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 24
Click image for larger version

Name:	ImageUploadedByiRV2 - RV Forum1408220197.831261.jpg
Views:	182
Size:	169.9 KB
ID:	70946


Sent from my iPhone using iRV2 - RV Forum
__________________
Stewart & Kim. 2011 Serrano 31V, MaxForce 7 w/ Allison 6 Sp. Fiat 500 Sport Diesel Pusher.
Surge Guard 3450, TST 510, Sliverleaf VMSpc, RVND 7710. Blue Ox Tow. 2010 Arctic Cat 700 TRV.
Someday your life may flash before your eyes. Make sure it's worth watching.
IMDSailor is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 03:44 PM   #90
Winnebago Camper
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by tedgard01 View Post
Dan,

After rereading your comment; "Although not really relevant, I agree with you." It occurred to me that you may have meant something like; "It may not be relevant if I agree with you....", versus meaning something like; "I don't find your comments to be relevant....".

If that is the case, I apologize for thinking that you were being rude...

Ted
Ted,

Thank you. That's exactly what I meant. Your comments are very relevant.

Regards,

Dan.
__________________
2003 TS Select 41DS03
Dan_public is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 04:10 PM   #91
Winnebago Camper
 
DMTTRANSPORT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francesca View Post
Yes, I know- requirement in that case is based on performance, though the standard isn't given. Such performance-based requirements are the norm rather than the exception but definitions are sorta mushy in some cases.

It's clearer elsewhere: For an example, Oregon (a State with no firm "requirement" for brakes on ANY towed unit) only firmly states required braking performance- they don't care how it's achieved. Here quoting page 15 at this ODOT publication:

So- if you're confident/satisfied that your rig can reliably do all that without brakes on the toad, you're golden.
LOL! Really...leave it to Orrygone, [@ 20 mph 8,000 lbs or over 35'] so @ 35,000 lbs I should be able to stop in 35' 60,000 also HA! , BIG DUAH!
__________________
2005 Newmar DS 4023, Spartan Chassis, ISL 370 Cumapart, 2008 Jeep Rubicon 4dr, 2015 Kia Soul, 1969 Italian & 2004 Akita
DMTTRANSPORT is offline  
Old 08-16-2014, 07:13 PM   #92
Winnebago Owner
 
AggieDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
What is it about people buying motorhomes worth $100,000+ and then choosing to save a mere thousand bucks for a safety device? Did you really totally empty the bank account when you bought your coach?

For those of you who do choose to "go cheap" when it comes to safety, please post your travel plans so the rest of us can make sure we are not sharing the road with you. Thank you.
__________________
Don Simmons
2006 Winnebago Voyage 33V Pushed by a 2014 Chevrolet Captiva
Visit us at Travels With Linda
AggieDad is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 06:20 AM   #93
Winnebago Camper
 
DMTTRANSPORT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by AggieDad View Post
What is it about people buying motorhomes worth $100,000+ and then choosing to save a mere thousand bucks for a safety device? Did you really totally empty the bank account when you bought your coach?

For those of you who do choose to "go cheap" when it comes to safety, please post your travel plans so the rest of us can make sure we are not sharing the road with you. Thank you.
Same as running cheap Tires on any vehicle....
__________________
2005 Newmar DS 4023, Spartan Chassis, ISL 370 Cumapart, 2008 Jeep Rubicon 4dr, 2015 Kia Soul, 1969 Italian & 2004 Akita
DMTTRANSPORT is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 06:50 AM   #94
Winnebago Camper
 
TwelveVolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 42
Do we really need a braking system in our toads?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AggieDad View Post
What is it about people buying motorhomes worth $100,000+ and then choosing to save a mere thousand bucks for a safety device? Did you really totally empty the bank account when you bought your coach?



For those of you who do choose to "go cheap" when it comes to safety, please post your travel plans so the rest of us can make sure we are not sharing the road with you. Thank you.

In re-reading the OP, he does not appear to be questioning the expenditure in dollars, but questioning the value based on his life experience of more than two decades. When you spent your $1000, did you get $1000 of safety value, or did you trade your $1000 cow for a handful of 'safety' beans based on the promises and dire predictions of the salesman and the marketing people? If the salesman at the next RV store was offering a $2000 even safer product, would you feel a social obligation to buy that too? (marketing people, listen up)

As someone mentioned earlier, there are two distinct points.

1) Is the aux brake product necessary for safe stopping, or does the design of the MH braking system handle the additional weight adequately? When you pull out of Flying J with 700 pounds of fuel and 800 pounds of water that you didn't have when you pulled in, you have slightly increased your stopping distance, but have you made your vehicle less safe?

2) Break-away braking.
TwelveVolt is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 07:08 AM   #95
Winnebago Camper
 
IMDSailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 24
Do we really need a braking system in our toads?

For me it has always been about the breakaway breaking. I run my rig well within its weight limits, therfore I expect it to break as per its design specs.
Having said that, the additional breaking supplied by the tow is appreciated.
My concern has always been the what if? These are highly complex mechanical devices we drive probe to braking down, sometimes catastrophically. My fear, concern, paranoia, call it what you will or makes you feel good, is if my 4000# tow becomes a ballistic missile.
I feel better knowing I have done what I can to never have to say... If only.
To play you have to pay, and if you can't pony up the few extra bucks for an aux break system after buying one of these rigs to fulfill, what I see as a social contract with your fellow users of the road, perhaps you shouldn't be playing.
Regardless of the law, the anecdotal evidenced is that having an aux break is a good idea.
Again, playing the odds is for a casino not the highway.


Sent from my iPhone using iRV2 - RV Forum
__________________
Stewart & Kim. 2011 Serrano 31V, MaxForce 7 w/ Allison 6 Sp. Fiat 500 Sport Diesel Pusher.
Surge Guard 3450, TST 510, Sliverleaf VMSpc, RVND 7710. Blue Ox Tow. 2010 Arctic Cat 700 TRV.
Someday your life may flash before your eyes. Make sure it's worth watching.
IMDSailor is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 07:16 AM   #96
Winnebago Owner
 
navychaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMTTRANSPORT View Post
Same as running cheap Tires on any vehicle....
What does that have to do with the OP's question? Also what is cheap? $100; $200; $1000; $10,000? Depends on the individual......

The reason I ask this question is I always look for the best deal available. I could have bought my Blue Ox Patriot from my local RV dealer and paid almost double what I paid on-line. So by definition I got a "cheap" braking system. I shop around for tires on all my vehicles and consider their use then get the best value for my buck. I do not always get the tires from a name brand shop and do not buy the same brand for each vehicle. Am I cheap?

Now back to the OP's question: My rig is rated at 5000# towing. That means Ford (in My Case) and Winnebago after adding the box says that an additional 5000# can be swinging on the rear of my rig. That means the engineering dept says the drive train is capable of pulling the additional weight and the braking system is capable of stopping the same. So, barring legal requirements and the benefits of a break away system, my rig can pull and stop an additional 5000# without additional braking, not that I would do so.....
__________________
2003 Winne Adventurer, Ford F53 V-10. Toad:1992 S-10, Road Master Falcon 2 Tow bar, Blue Ox Patriot brake system and Protect-a-Tow. Right is right even if no one is doing it; Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it--St Augustine of Hippo. Navy AD.
navychaps is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 08:58 AM   #97
Winnebago Camper
 
TwelveVolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 42
Enough talk, time for some action.

For the record, I have three aux brakes from two manufacturers. The first one I bought for next to nothing because it was broken. Thought I could use it to understand the technology and for parts. The second I bought used at a rally when I was in the market for a toad. The third came with the toad. All three were defective. The first seller was the only one to admit it. This fact, plus looking at the technology while repairing them makes me skeptical of their value as service brakes.

My concern, as noted by others, is also with the idea of the break-away event. Rather than have my toad stopped by itself in the middle of high speed traffic, I would far prefer to have it remain attached to the coach.

From the YouTube installation videos, I see that all the base plate manufacturers have added safety cables between the plate and car chassis in recent years. I assume this was not simply prompted by the manufacturers' desire to increase their parts cost. Conversely, none of the tow hitch videos show permanent safety cables.

My break-away electric cable instructions say to clip the cable to a part of the MH chassis, not the hitch itself, in the event that the hitch fasteners fail and it comes off. Since I don't want my hitch and therefore toad to come off, I am headed over to Harbor Freight to get a couple of cables and oval connectors this afternoon. Sidewalk sale this weekend. See you there.
TwelveVolt is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 09:06 AM   #98
Winnebago Watcher
 
eggman1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4
I don't claim to be an expert or even knowledgeable of any rig or style of RV except mine. One of our first runs we went into the mountains of Northern New Mexico, wow the angle of climb and decent got steep fast and after about a half hour or so we smoked the brakes. Fortunately no person or RV was ultimately harmed in the experience but it sure increased the pucker factor. When we got home I added a Brake Buddy as quick as I could.

Now what I notice is that the RV and toad will brake as quickly and easily as if it were the RV alone. Very noticeable and immediate effect. It's not a perfect system but I won't travel without it for this and so many of the other reasons already mentioned. Just my 2 cents.
__________________
Jerry and Linda, retired June 2013, full timers
2017 DSDP 4369 with 2011 GMC Terrain toad
Blue Ox, Brake Buddy
eggman1950 is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 10:33 AM   #99
Winnebago Camper
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by navychaps View Post

Now back to the OP's question: My rig is rated at 5000# towing. That means Ford (in My Case) and Winnebago after adding the box says that an additional 5000# can be swinging on the rear of my rig. That means the engineering dept says the drive train is capable of pulling the additional weight and the braking system is capable of stopping the same. So, barring legal requirements and the benefits of a break away system, my rig can pull and stop an additional 5000# without additional braking, not that I would do so.....
That's not correct. If you look in any owner's manual for any vehicle, you will see a statement like "The braking system of the tow vehicle is rated for operation at the GVWR not GCWR." The Combined Weight Rating is a factor of what the drive train can pull, not what the towing vehicle can brake.

And, just because you have a 5,000 lb hitch doesn't mean you can haul a 5,000 pound unbraked car or trailer. Trailer hitch ratings assume a braked towed vehicle.
__________________
John McKinley
2007 Damon Daybreak 3060, Ford 16,000# Chassis,
Ford C-Max Hybrid Toad , Suzuki V Strom 1000cc
jmckinley is offline  
Old 08-17-2014, 11:09 AM   #100
Winnebago Camper
 
Francesca's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Port Hadlock, Washington
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmckinley View Post
That's not correct. If you look in any owner's manual for any vehicle, you will see a statement like "The braking system of the tow vehicle is rated for operation at the GVWR not GCWR." The Combined Weight Rating is a factor of what the drive train can pull, not what the towing vehicle can brake.

And, just because you have a 5,000 lb hitch doesn't mean you can haul a 5,000 pound unbraked car or trailer. Trailer hitch ratings assume a braked towed vehicle.
I think he's right, Navychaps- especially since in looking just now at your model year Adventurer's brochure, there's language way downpage per "actual towing capacity" that mentions braking systems on the towed unit. That seems to me to indicate that Winnebago is saying that brakes on that unit are not adequate to stop the full amount of weight otherwise "allowed".

Guess it's really no different from tow ratings on other vehicles- many mfr.s give two tow numbers, one with and one without brakes on the towed unit.
Francesca is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
toad, toads


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Braking System craig C Towing, Hitching and Vehicles 26 02-02-2017 07:54 AM
Winnebago View TOADS gaugeguy Winnebago Class C Motorhomes 10 02-28-2012 06:48 AM
Do you really need slider locks? IMPULSE DRIVEN General Maintenance and Repair 18 07-25-2011 08:09 AM
TOADS tps0424 Towing, Hitching and Vehicles 12 12-08-2006 07:44 AM
ABS braking system in Freightliner chassis General Maintenance and Repair 8 12-31-1969 07:00 PM

» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Winnebago Industries or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.